The Devil-Doll (1936)

THE DEVIL-DOLL (1936)
Article #32 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-17-2001
Posting date: 8-30-2001

This isn’t the first movie to deal with tiny people (a handful of them pop up in BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN), but it may be the first where the concept is central to the plot. A man falsely convicted of murder (Lionel Barrymore) manages to escape from prison with the help of another inmate, who happens to be a scientist experimenting with a process of reducing animals and people to small sizes and controlling them mentally. When the scientist dies, the convict joins forces with the scientist’s widow (Rafaelo Ottiano), and, in disguise as an old woman who makes toys, uses the small people to gain revenge and prove his innocence.

Despite the fact that I have several problems with this movie, I really like it; in fact, I find something tremendously moving in Barrymore’s relationship with his daughter. One of the movie’s problems is that it feels like two different movies that somehow got mixed together; the convict-proving-his-innocence story has a serious edge that seems at odds with the lighter-toned miniature people angle. You could have made two different movies out of this story.

Nevertheless, I quite enjoy it. Lionel Barrymore is always fun to watch, even though I don’t find him entirely convincing as an old woman (for that matter, I have the same problem with Lon Chaney’s similar performances in both versions of THE UNHOLY THREE, of which this movie may be a partial remake), and Rafaelo Ottiano’s bizarre crippled widow with the shock of white hair is one of the stranger characters out there; Tod Browning certainly had a big hand in coming up with this character. And the ending of this movie where Barrymore meets his daughter (Maureen O’Sullivan) atop the Eiffel Tower is a truly poignant scene.

The Devil Bat (1940)

THE DEVIL BAT (1940)
Article #31 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-16-2001
Posting date: 8-29-2001

In this movie, Bela Lugosi as Dr. Paul Carruthers develops a strain of giant killer bats that attack people who wear a specific after-shave lotion, also of his design. He uses it to eliminate those who made a profit off of his other creations. Fortunately, a reporter is investigating the murders, along with his photographer, “One-Shot” McGuire (a tribute to low-budget director William “One-Shot” Beaudine, maybe?).

This is one of PRC’s first horror movies, and it’s fairly entertaining, despite the obvious cheapness of the production. A little too much time is spent with the reporters, especially the sequences where they fake a photograph of the bat. Lugosi does a fine job, as usual, and watching how he gets his victims to use the after-shave lotion is part of the fun of the movie. I also find his motivation novel and interesting; rather than seeking revenge on those who scorned his scientific theories, he is a disgruntled employee who thinks he should have gotten a greater share of the profits.

This movie was more or less remade a few years later as THE FLYING SERPENT, with George Zucco.

Beauty and the Beast (1946)

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1946)
Article #30 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-15-2001
Posting date: 8-28-2001

A merchant who loses his way spends the night in an enchanted castle, but finds himself under a sentence of death from the beast that lives there when he tries to pluck a rose from a bush. He is allowed to return home to settle his affairs, and his daughter Belle agrees to take his place at the castle. The beast keeps Belle prisoner until she agrees to marry him.

Visually, this movie is a sumptuous feast; the enchanted castle, with its candelabras on arms and moving faces in the stoneworks, is one of the most stunning creations in the annals of fantasy films. There are visions that stick in the memory; the beast wandering through the hallways, clothes in disarray, smoke rising from his fingers after he has just made a kill, is a wonderful sight. It also contains one of my very favorite special effects moments in cinema; when Belle gives a string of pearls to one of her sisters, the sister immediately tosses it to the ground, where you notice it has turned into a string of ugly rotten vegetables (at least that’s what I think they are; whatever they are, it looks disgusting). I don’t know how they pulled off this trick (it may have been nothing more than sleight of hand), but it’s done so smoothly it seems like pure magic. Jean Cocteau has certainly directed an amazing movie here.

However, I do have a few problems; for some reason, I don’t really lose myself in the story. I don’t know if there’s something about this movie in particular, or something about French cinema in general (I have problems with a lot of French cinema), but I always find myself at an arm’s length from the action. I even have more problems with the ending…

SPOILERS AHEAD

I can’t say that I’ve spent a lot of time wondering what a handsome prince would look like, but the one into which the beast transforms at the end of this movie is NOT what I would envision; to me, he looks for all the world like Liberace. And Belle’s curious behavior at the end of the movie where she responds to each of the prince’s statements in distracted monosyllables just baffles me: I’ve read that she’s supposed to be flirting, but it looks to me like she’s either forgotten her lines or doing her best to keep from laughing. For me, it makes for a disappointing ending to an otherwise brilliant movie.

The Bells (1926)

THE BELLS (1926)
Article #29 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-14-2001
Posting date: 8-27-2001

In this movie, an innkeeper (Lionel Barrymore) aspiring to the position of burgomaster wins friends (and votes) by giving away free drinks, but depletes his funds in the process. To get out of debt, her murders a rich traveler for his money. After he is elected, the traveler’s brother shows up, demanding that the murderer be found, and he brings along a mesmerist (Boris Karloff) who guarantees he can find the murderer.

This movie was the fifth version of a popular stage play, and is essentially a variation on Crime and Punishment; the innkeeper finds himself haunted by his murder, and dreams of the mesmerist trapping him into admitting his crimes. It’s nothing great, but it is an adaquate time killer, with good performances from both Barrymore and Gustav von Seyffertitz (from SPARROWS and THE BAT WHISPERS), but the main attraction here is Karloff, in one of his few good roles during the silent era. As the mesmerist, he is dressed and made up to resemble Werner Krauss in THE CABINET OF DR. CALIGARI, and he seems to be having quite a bit of fun.

Death Curse of Tartu (1966)

DEATH CURSE OF TARTU (1966)
Article #28 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-13-2001
Posting date: 8-26-2001

Tartu is a Seminole witch doctor who has placed a curse on his burial site; if anyone desecrates the area, he returns in the form of an animal and wreaks vengeance. You can guess what happens when an archaelogical expedition with lots of teenagers invades the area…

This very cheap ancient curse epic has a few things going for it; the movie was shot in the Florida Everglades, so the swamp looks quite convincing indeed. Also, some of the attack scenes have a certain visceral impact, particularly when the snake repeatedly bites one of the teens in the face. The teens are a fairly uninteresting lot, though: they dance to music, make out, and do all the things teens do in these movies, and they really don’t have much in the way of character beyond that. And the final sequence —

SPOILERS COMING

— when Tartu turns into a Seminole warrior and chases one of the girls for several minutes is more silly and annoying than scary; as a rule, I tend to dislike scenes which have hysterical women continually screaming. Instead of striking terror into my heart, I’m left with the feeling that the director just chose the easiest way he could to convince me that what was happening was scary, and I’m left with the sense of the laziness and cheapness of that technique.

Incidentally, back when I was a kid and I first started watching my local Creature Feature show, my mom used to sit up and watch with me and complain about these old movies being in black and white. This movie was the first one in color that the show had aired; my mom was not home that night to see. I always wonder if the presence of color in this movie would have automatically made it superior in her eyes to the Universal Classics they were largely showing at the time.

Dead Men Walk (1943)

DEAD MEN WALK (1943)
Article #27 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-12-2001
Posting date: 8-25-2001

A man discovers that his recently deceased brother has become a vampire, and sets out to destroy him.

The plot description is pretty basic, and I don’t think there’s a whole lot beyond that; I remember it as being a fairly dull, drab affair. The most interesting aspects of this film are the rather silly doom-talking elderly spinster, Kate: Dwight Frye, in one of his very last roles as Zolarr (and he doesn’t look at all well); the fact that the movie does not follow conventional vampire lore, as the brother becomes a vampire through the use of black magic; and finally, George Zucco in a dual role. This is particularly surprising; Zucco is not one of the actors I would imagine in a dual role, but he does quite well. It’s also interesting to to consider that neither of his two roles are conventional roles for him; I rarely see him as either a heroic figure or a vampire.

With all these unusual elements in the movie, I wish I didn’t find it as lifeless as I do; it should have been much more interesting.

Day of Wrath (1943)

DAY OF WRATH (1943)
Article #26 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-11-2001
Posting date: 8-24-2001

This movie is about a young woman who becomes the second wife to an elderly pastor against the wishes of the pastor’s mother. Her own mother, now dead, was accused of witchcraft, but the pastor had her charges dropped out of love for her daughter. When another old woman in the neighborhood is accused of witchcraft, she turns to the pastor for help, which does not come; she is executed to the sound of a children’s choir (a truly unsettling scene), but not before she prophecies the deaths of both the pastor and another member of the church tribunal. Meanwhile, the wife has met and fallen in love with the son of the pastor from his first marriage, and finds herself wishing for the pastor’s death.

This may not be strictly a horror movie, and those expecting one may well be disappointed. It is, however, a dark, brooding and quite powerful drama, directed by Carl Dreyer (VAMPYR) in Denmark during the German occupation. With its themes and subject matter, it certainly could not have been made in Hollywood at the time. I find it haunting and tragic, with that same touch of ambiguity to be found in the Lewton films; whether the young wife is a witch or not depends on how certain events that occur near the end of the movie are interpreted.

Battle in Outer Space (1960)

BATTLE IN OUTER SPACE (1960)
Article #25 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-9-2001
Posting date: 8-23-2001

When I was preparing to write about this movie for the next Movie of the Day, I realized to my horror that I couldn’t remember a thing about it. So I hunted it up and watched it again, and I realized why; it’s mainly action sci-fi, and action movies have a way of not keeping a strong hold on my memory cells. It’s not too bad for all that, I suppose; I found it easier to follow than THE MYSTERIANS though nowhere near as compelling as GORATH (though, in all honesty, the latter is the only one of the three which I have seen in a subtitled version; the others were dubbed). The story is straighforward; aliens attack the earth. The first part of the story deals with brainwashed humans and their intrigues on this planet. The second part involves a trip to the moon to destroy a base of the aliens. The final third is the actual invasion. It’s not badly done, but the lack of characters in the final part tends to make it rather tedious, and I have serious reservations about the scientific theory that lowering the temperatures of objects causes them to resist gravity; I have yet to catch anything floating in my freezer.

Dagora, the Space Monster (1964)

DAGORA, THE SPACE MONSTER (1964)
(a.k.a. DOGORA)
Article #24 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-8-2001
Posting date: 8-22-2001

In this movie, jewel thieves and detectives hunt for diamonds that keep vanishing, and everyone thinks everyone else has them. As it turns out, the culprit is not human, but a giant jellyfish/octopus monster that lives in the sky and feeds on carbon (diamonds, coal, etc.).

This is one of the strangest monsters Toho ever produced; not a man in a monster suit, but a rarely seen half-puppet half-animated creation with tendrils that reach down out of the sky to retrieve what it wants. This is the only appearance of this monster; it did not even appear in DESTROY ALL MONSTERS, as it really doesn’t work on the same level as Godzilla and his friends. In fact, so much time is spent on the gangsters, detectives and scientists that the monster almost feels like a subplot rather than the main subject of the movie. I believe the movie had a satiric and/or comic intent, but only traces of this can be found in the somewhat confusedly dubbed American version; I would very much like to see a subtitled version of this one day.

The Cyclops (1957)

THE CYCLOPS (1957)
Article #23 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing date: 4-7-2001
Posting date: 8-21-2001

In this Bert I. Gordon movie, Gloria Talbot plays a woman searching for her fiance whose plane crashed in a South American jungle loaded with uranium and radioactivity. She searches the area with the help of three men (including Lon Chaney Jr.), and discovers a bunch of giant animals, and finally a giant with half his face melted away and only one eye.

I think this movie predates THE AMAZING COLOSSAL MAN, so that would make it Gordon’s first Giant Man movie: the giant man in WAR OF THE COLOSSAL BEAST is very similar to this one. Unfortunately, it’s a very dull movie, one that takes forever to get to the action (like KING DINOSAUR). The presence of Lon Chaney Jr. is interesting, but it’s definitely one of his weaker performances; I don’t think he’s right for the broad villainous type of character he plays here. On the other hand, he was given one of those greedy stupid conniving coward roles that are hard to watch no matter who is playing them; they’re the type of character whose death is inevitable, and when it occurs, you feel neither sadness nor joy, just relief.