Tentacles (1977)

TENTACLES (1977)
aka Tentacoli
Article 5414 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 4-4-2017
Directed by Ovidio G. Assonitis
Featuring John Huston, Shelley Winters, Bo Hopkins
Country: Italy USA
What it is: Eight Arms to Hold You With

A giant killer octopus terrorizes a seaside community.

John Huston is an intrepid reporter intent on finding the truth. Shelley Winters is a worried mother. Bo Hopkins is an oceanographer in charge of two killer whales who has a personal reason for killing the octopus. Claude Akins is a sheriff. Henry Fonda is the head of a company called Trojan which may be responsible for creating the killer octopus (I’m guessing the reporter must have found out through a leak or something). And then there’s whoever composed one of the most inappropriate scores in movie history; whatever chance this thriller had of dredging up a shred of suspense is lost in the web of apathy this soundtrack spins over every scene. Not that the movie had a good thing going; except for a couple of well-staged scenes, most of the movie drowns in a sea of smothering dialogue scenes that accomplish nothing and go nowhere. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a movie that so constantly takes the wind out of the sails of the plot. It drifts aimlessly and ends up dead in the water. And when it tries to pull off the same fake scare twice in a row, you’ll want to slap it silly.

Did I mention that the movie wasn’t very good?

Something Wicked This Way Comes (1983)

SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES (1983)
Article 5413 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 4-3-2017
Directed by Jack Clayton
Featuring Jason Robards, Jonathan Pryce, Diane Ladd
Country: USA
What it is: Horrific fantasy

An autumn circus comes to a small town and offers its residents a chance to fulfill their deepest wishes… but at a price.

The original Ray Bradbury novel proved to be a pivotal read for me in my early years; it is the novel that drew me into the world of literary science fiction and fantasy and especially the work of Ray Bradbury, so you might imagine I have strong feelings about the work. So it’s also no surprise when a movie version came out, I was definitely drawn into the theater to see it. I loved it then, and to some extent I still love it today, though I now see its flaws. The screenplay is an adaptation by Bradbury himself, and as is often the case with his work, what looks good on the printed page sometimes comes out clumsy when said out loud as dialogue. Furthermore, the movie has a little trouble balancing out the fantasy aspects with the horror aspects; this is particularly noticeable at the climax of the movie. The biggest problem I had back then involved a major difference between the movie and the book; the latter had a sequence involving the witch hunting the children in a hot-air balloon (if my memory is correct), and though I suspected this scene would have been nearly impossible to pull off in the movie, its solution to substitute a spider attack scene was very unsatisfying. However, what I loved about the movie is that it actually managed to capture some of Bradbury’s poetry and flavor visually (such as the sequence where Mr. Dark tosses the announcements of the arrival of the circus out in the street so that the wind will distribute them), and I thought Jonathan Pryce’s performance was wonderful. At any rate, my favorite moment in the movie back then remains my favorite moment now; it’s the scene in the library where Mr. Dark tempts Will’s father with youth by tearing out pages of a book to indicate the passage of time, each page glowing as it flutters off, and it is pure cinematic magic.

Slaughter High (1986)

SLAUGHTER HIGH (1986)
Article 5412 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 4-2-2017
Directed by George Dugdale, Mark Ezra, Peter Mackenzie Litten
Featuring Caroline Munro, Simon Scuddamore, Carmine Iannaccone
Country: UK / USA
What it is: What it sounds like

An April Fool’s Day prank causes the mutilation of a high school student. Years later, the perpetrators of the prank find themselves the only ones attending a High School Reunion, and someone begins knocking them off.

It took three directors to make this? It was originally going to be called APRIL FOOL’S DAY, but they changed it when they didn’t want it to be confused with the other slasher film called APRIL FOOL’S DAY. Not that this one is different enough that you won’t confuse it with any number of other slasher films out there. There’s one good jump scare, but that’s about the only thing I liked about this one. Other than that, the most interesting things about are the presence of Caroline Munro (guess who’s going to be the last girl standing?) and that the twist ending wasn’t what I expected (which isn’t to say that it’s a good one). The rest is by the book and business as usual.

The Sentinel (1977)

THE SENTINEL (1977)
Article 5411 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 4-1-2017
Directed by Michael Winner
Featuring Chris Sarandon, Cristina Raines, Ava Gardner
Country: USA
What it is: The job interview from hell

A troubled model who once tried to commit suicide decides she’s not quite ready for marriage yet, so instead of staying with her boyfriend, she moves into her own apartment in an old house. The other residents she meets seem very strange, but then she discovers there’s only one other resident, a blind priest on the top floor. Then who did she meet…?

Practically every other write-up gives away a major revelation that doesn’t manifest itself until late in the movie, but it’s hard to fault them; after all, between the title and the ad campaign for this one, the marketing for the movie also gives away that same revelation. I rather wish it hadn’t; once you know the revelation, you can second guess a lot of events that happen in this movie long before the movie gives them away, and that rather ruins the fun a little. A lot of big names and familiar faces pop up, though many in little more than cameos; there’s Burgess Meredith, Ava Gardner, Martin Balsam, John Carradine, Jose Ferrer, Arthur Kennedy, Eli Wallach, and soon-to-be stars Jeff Goldblum and Christopher Walken (who upstages everyone in every scene he’s in though he barely has any lines). There’s some creepy and bizarre moments here, but there’s also a bit of dead space, some plot elements that never coalesce, and an overabundance of unnecessary gore. All in all, it never quite comes together, though many of the ideas are interesting. It’s a nice try, but a misfire.

Salem’s Lot (1979)

SALEM’S LOT (1979)
Article 5410 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 3-31-2017
Directed by Tobe Hooper
Featuring David Soul, James Mason, Lance Kerwin
Country: USA
What it is: Stephen King two-part TV-Movie

A writer returns to his home town to write a book about an eerie old house in the town, only to discover that a real evil has moved into the house…

For the record, I just finished watching the complete three hour version of this TV-Movie that ran over two nights when it was first shown. There’s a 107 minute version out there, and I’m still wondering if I might not have been better off watching that one; not to slight the full version, but it’s a bit on the strenuous side to watch in one sitting. Furthermore, I’m not sure that a whole lot of the essence would be gone in a shorter version; there are quite a few subplots and smaller story arcs that could have been removed, though they do help flesh out the longer version. I’ve read the original Stephen King novel, but it’s been quite a while since I’ve done so, but the movie more or less feels rather faithful to the book. The movie ties the “evil place” template with the standard vampire tale, and the movie is a solid, well-acted piece of work. Granted, in comparison to some of Tobe Hooper’s earlier work, this one is pretty tame, but I do like that the interior of the Marston house at least partially recalls the interior of the house in THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE. There are lots of familiar faces in this one; outside those listed above, we have Lew Ayres, Fred Willard, Marie Windsor, (not near enough of) Elisha Cook, Jr., and the ever popular Reggie Nalder as the vampire. All in all, it’s a good adaptation of the work, though I suspect that if I wanted to experience the story again, I’d opt for re-reading the King novel.

Real Genius (1985)

REAL GENIUS (1985)
Article 5409 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 3-30-2017
Directed by Martha Coolidge
Featuring Val Kilmer, Gabriel Jarret, Michelle Meyrink
Country: USA
What it is: Eccentric teen comedy

A fifteen-year-old science prodigy is accepted at a special university and finds himself working on a super-laser, unaware that the project will be used by the military as a weapon of assassination.

I blew hot and cold on this comedy while I was watching it, largely because the things I didn’t like about were the first things trotted out of the gate; the villains of the piece are such jerks that I found it hard to both believe and endure them, and there’s a certain smugness around the edges of the movie that turns me off. For a while this made me not notice the things I like about the movie; the heroes of the story are a truly eccentric and likable bunch (though in some cases you have to get to know them to appreciate them), some of the jokes are very funny, and the movie generally tries to avoid overt slapstick and gross-out humor. Eventually, the positive aspects of the movie won out, especially since I was deeply amused by the inspired final act of revenge in the movie. This was part of a trio of comedies I tend to link together in my mind, the other two being MY SCIENCE PROJECT and WEIRD SCIENCE. I’ve not seen the latter, but I have seen the former, and this one easily beats it out.

I’ll See You in Hell (1960)

I’LL SEE YOU IN HELL (1960)
aka Ti aspettero all’inferno
Article 5408 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 3-29-2017
Directed by Piero Regnoli
Featuring John Drew Barrymore, Eva Bartok, Antonio Pierfederici
Country: Italy
What it is: Crime movie, and maybe something else…

When a jewel heist results in the death of a night watchman, the three thieves take it on the lam. On their way to a hideout, one of them falls into quicksand and is not saved by the other two. Will the dead man strike back from the grave?

Could this heist movie turn out to be an actual “revenge from beyond the grave” horror movie as well? Or could it be that someone found a new way to doctor DIABOLIQUE once again? I’m not going to say which is true, but you may want to bear in mind there are other possibilities, and though I will credit the movie for keeping me guessing in this respect, I don’t think the movie necessarily chose the most interesting of its options. The movie works all right part of the time; at other times, it feels unfocused and distracted, partly due to the fact that the plot is a bit on the thin side when you look at it as a whole, and seems padded to fill the running time. Also, I don’t feel the John Drew Barrymore character really comes across as convincing, but that may be that the movie doesn’t really achieve the intimacy with the character that it needs to do so. All in all, it’s interesting, but it’s a mixed bag.

Haunted Range (1926)

HAUNTED RANGE (1926)
Article 5407 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 3-28-2017
Directed by Paul Hurst
Featuring Ken Maynard, Alma Rayford, Harry Moody
Country: USA
What it is: Weird Western, silent style

A new cowboy owns the Baldwin ranch, but he discovers there’s a gang in town run by a man named Foster that doesn’t like him. Furthermore, the ranch seems to be haunted by a night-riding ghost.

It took me quite a while to hunt down a copy of this one, and the print I found doesn’t appear to be anywhere near complete; the opening is missing, there are jump cuts, and altogether the movie runs about thirty minutes. There is, however, enough here to get a good idea of what it’s about; the crucial final reel is mostly there. It looks like a fairly decent entry in the genre, though it does have the requisite scared black character whenever the ghost shows up. My favorite scene features a chase up a steep cliff. And there is one bizarre scene that I’d really like an explanation for; at one point. several cowboys get distracted by a bevy of bathing beauties that appear out of nowhere. Why? I don’t know, but maybe that’s why they’re called weird westerns.

Killer Fish (1979)

KILLER FISH (1979)
Article 5406 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 3-27-2017
Directed by Antonio Margheriti
Featuring Lee Majors, Karen Black, Margaux Hemingway
Country: Italy / UK / Brazil /USA
What it is: IMDB says Horror, but…

A gang of jewel thieves in Brazil hides a box of stolen jewels in a lake and plans to wait sixty days before returning to recover the treasure. However, one member of the gang tries to make sure his partners don’t cheat on him by releasing piranha in the lake.

Someday I’ll come up with a category for movies that purport to be one type of movie but are actually another. The title of this one evokes memories of both JAWS and PIRANHA, and this movie would most likely not have been made if not for the success of these other movies. However, the killer fish aspect of the story is not the main plot, which is mostly concerned about the betrayals and double-crosses of a gang of jewel thieves. Even beyond that, the movie is more noteworthy for its spectacle and scenes of destruction (I wonder if Margheriti really had a hankering to make a disaster movie) than of its horror content. I don’t think the movie is badly done; its low rating on IMDB probably has more to do with the fact that it isn’t really the horror movie it seems to promise. Despite the presence of Italian director Margheriti, there’s no dubbing issue here; the movie was mostly shot in English, and there’s a lot of well-known English-speaking actors in the cast. Go in expecting a crime movie with some horror elements, and you’ll appreciate this one more.

Predator (1987)

PREDATOR (1987)
Article 5405 by Dave Sindelar
Date: 3-26-2017
Directed by John McTiernan
Featuring Arnold Schwarzenegger, Carl Weathers, Kevin Peter Hall
Country: USA
What it is: Action SF thriller

A team of commandos undertake a rescue mission in the jungle, but soon find themselves hunted by an extraterrestrial sportsman.

I always considered Arnold Schwarzenegger a somewhat limited actor who became a star as a result of his shrewd choices for properties to work on; he didn’t really stumble until THE LAST ACTION HERO, but he never recovered from that one. This one I remember not being a big critical favorite, though it definitely was a popular one. Certainly, the compendium of action cliches that make up the first thirty minutes of this movie don’t really impress, but I do recognize the efficiency with which this part is handled (after all, there are some action movies that would have considered the story for the first third of this movie to be enough for a whole feature film), and I know that this section is just the setup for the main portion of the movie, in which the military team finds itself the target of an extraterrestrial hunter. The latter portion of the movie works very well indeed, as the team must discover the nature of their hunter and find strategies to defeat it before they’re all killed. Dialogue is kept to a very minimum during the very tense climax of the movie, though it could have been cut even further; at least once during this section, Schwarzenegger utters one of his trademark one-line quips that almost took me out of the movie. Still, the movie recovers quickly enough that no real damage is done. No, it’s not perfect, but it is very entertaining, and it serves as a good model for a science fiction / horror action thriller.