Kill, Baby, Kill (1966)

KILL, BABY, KILL (1966)
(a.k.a. OPERAZIONE PAURA)
Article #1552 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-14-2005
Posting Date: 11-11-2005
Directed by Mario Bava
Featuring Giacomo Rossi-Stuart, Erika Blanc, Fabienne Dali

A coroner is called to a small town to perform an autopsy on a woman who died an unusual death. He discovers a coin buried in her heart, and finds out that her death is tied to strange visions of a little girl.

This movie has a variable reputation. Some people consider it Bava’s best movie, while others feel disappointed. I can understand both reactions. The movie is enticingly mysterious, effectively moody, and uses color wonderfully. It is also full of very striking scenes; in particular, I like a sequence where the hero chases someone through the same room several times in succession only to catch him and discover—well, I won’t give it away. Yet that scene also points to the movie’s problem; ultimately, there’s no satisfactory explanation for it. It’s a case where the mystery element is a lot more compelling than the disappointing and incomplete explanations, and the climax of the movie doesn’t quite deliver the necessary scares. Certainly, the title doesn’t help; it makes it sound for all the world like it’s about a serial killer, and that doesn’t capture it. Still, I think the movie is worth catching for the mood and certain individual moments; only the disappointing ending really holds it back.

Jonathan (1970)

JONATHAN (1970)
Article #1551 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-13-2005
Posting Date: 11-10-2005
Directed by Hans W. Geissendorfer
Featuring Jurgen Jung, Hans-Dieter Jendreyko, Paul Albert Krumm

A group of villagers plan an assault on the castle of a vampire, and send a man named Jonathan as an advance scout.

This movie has a rating of 4.9 on IMDB at the time of this writing, so I suspect that its reputation is not good. Me, I found it fascinating. It’s not really a version of “Dracula”, but it takes certain key scenes in the first part of the Stoker novel (Jonathan being warned not to enter any locked room, Jonathan being approached by the three female vampires which are then driven away by the Count and then given a baby to satisfy their desires, etc.) that are used as a jumping off point to tell a different story. It’s not an easy story to follow; it’s full of scenes that seem to have little to do with the main story line, and it’s a pretty arty affair. Still, even if I don’t know where individual scenes fit in, I find each scene interesting as separate entities. According to IMDB, this movie is in color, and I suspect I have a faded copy, as only the color red can be seen in many scenes; other than that, it looks as if it’s in black and white. Still, this in itself makes it interesting watching. Political and religious interpretations abound in this one. All in all, I recommend this one, but I suspect you’ll have little use for it if you don’t care for movies like VAMPYR.

The Jekyll and Hyde Portfolio (1972)

THE JEKYLL AND HYDE PORTFOLIO (1972)
Article #1550 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-12-2005
Posting Date: 11-9-2005
Directed by Eric Jeffrey Haims
Featuring Sebastian Brook, Mady Maguire, Donn Greer

The police investigate a gruesome murder at a nurse’s institute. Other murders start occurring, with each of the bodies mutilated with a V-shaped symbol.

Who is the murderer? The mysterious Dr. Cabala, head of the institute, who has a sword hidden in his cane? The disturbed head nurse who was traumatized by the death of her daughter and seeks to “protect” women from the invasions of men? The horny mute in the basement? The doctor who dissects live frogs because a) it’s fun, and b) it impresses the girls? The bitter and scarred cook who calls herself the “Chicken Chopper”? The really big question is: Will you really care? This confusing mishmash of gore (some of it gratuitous; I don’t think frogs have that much blood in them, though I do suspect real frogs gave up their lives for this one), sex (lesbian and hetero), bad narration, shaky camerawork and horrendous acting certainly didn’t trip my trigger. If I were a serial killer, I hope they would give me a cooler theme song than a calliope version of “The Man on the Flying Trapeze”. And if I were a man of science, I wouldn’t deliver the movie’s funniest line, “I’m a man of science. I don’t call a thing a thing until I know it’s a thing.” And one more question: if the movie takes place in the nineteenth century, why do all of the naked women have bikini tan lines?

Jack and the Beanstalk (1952)

JACK AND THE BEANSTALK (1952)
Article #1549 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-11-2005
Posting Date: 11-8-2005
Directed by Jean Yarbrough
Featuring Bud Abbott, Lou Costello, Buddy Baer

A babysitter imagines himself living the story of Jack and the Beanstalk.

Is it a fairy tale or an Abbott and Costello movie? It’s more of the latter, really; if the movie didn’t feature Lou Costello as the hero, I don’t think it would have been of much interest to me as a child, especially since at that time I would have been enormously disappointed by the fact that the giant was nothing more than a really tall guy. It’s not one of their best, relying as it does on mostly physical slapstick, which was never a real strength with Bud and Lou. Still, I think it’s a lot better than SNOW WHITE AND THE THREE STOOGES. Two observations: I wonder where they got the idea to film the opening and ending sequences in tinted black and white and the middle in color? Also, I couldn’t help but notice that the talking harp is so annoying that no one decides to make off with it during the course of the movie.

Island of Lost Women (1959)

ISLAND OF LOST WOMEN (1959)
Article #1548 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-10-2005
Posting Date: 11-7-2005
Directed by Frank Tuttle
Featuring Jeff Richards, Venetia Stevenson, John Smith

Two men crash-land on an uncharted island, only to find that the island is home for a nuclear scientist (who wanted to escape the real world) and his three beautiful daughters.

The most amazing thing about this movie is that it takes itself rather seriously given the campy premise. The science fiction element is present, since the scientist does come up with some gadgetry, in particular a gun converted into a flame-thrower. The story is pretty basic; the men land on the island and want to get away. The scientist doesn’t want anyone to find out he’s there, so he plots to keep the men from leaving the island, especially as one of them is a reporter who makes it clear that he will reveal the presence of the scientist on the island. Meanwhile, two of the beautiful daughters become attached to the two men and try to help them, while the third, young and jealous, tries to foil their plans. It’s watchable but silly, and ends with the most ridiculous nuclear explosion since KILLERS FROM SPACE. Still, I can’t help but notice how the plot of this movie bears a certain degree of similarity to that of FORBIDDEN PLANET.

The Invisible Killer (1939)

THE INVISIBLE KILLER (1939)
Article #1547 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-9-2005
Posting Date: 11-6-2005
Directed by Sam Newfield
Featuring Grace Bradley, Roland Drew, Jean Brooks

When a man who was about to spill important information about a gambling syndicate dies unexpectedly of poisoning, police detectives and a spunky girl reporter decide to investigate.

The title implies that there’s an invisible man in this movie, and some of the graphics during the credits do so as well. Don’t you believe it. Just because a killer is invisible doesn’t mean that the killer is something that is usually visible; nor is there anything to specify that the killer is even sentient. What we have here is a fairly lame crime movie with a slight science fiction gimmick to spice up the proceedings a little, and when I say “little”, I do mean “not much at all”. So, unless you’re particularly partial to spunky girl reporters who infuriate their police detective fiances, you can safely skip this one. Included here for slight science fiction content.

Invasion (1966)

INVASION (1966)
Article #1546 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-8-2005
Posting Date: 11-5-2005
Directed by Alan Bridges
Featuring Edward Judd, Yoko Tani, Valerie Gearon

When an old man in his car accidentally hits a man in a strange uniform, he brings the injured man to a hospital. Upon discovering that the injured man is an alien, the staff and residents of the hospital find themselves trapped inside by a force field.

I blow a little hot and cold on British science fiction and horror. I feel they pay a lot of attention to detail, and as a result, they tend to move a little slower than their American counterparts. Sometimes this makes their movies more intriguing, and sometimes it makes them more tedious. Fortunately, this is one of the movies that falls into the former category. It’s fascinating to watch the various parts of the story fall into place; in particular, I love the way the movie illustrates the momentary failure of electricity that marks the arrival of the aliens, and the way the interesting character relationships pull your attention to some points of exposition. The movie does remind you of several other science fiction movies; the idea of humans being caught up in a chase among aliens for a criminal popped up in THE BRAIN FROM PLANET AROUS (and would also pop up in THE HIDDEN), the alien being hit by a car reminds me a little of INVASION OF THE SAUCER MEN, and the fact that for most of the movie one alien is a hospital patient recalls the opening of THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL. All in all, this one is very effective; only a disappointing ending drags it down.

Inquisition (1976)

INQUISITION (1976)
(a.k.a. INQUISICION)
Article #1545 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-7-2005
Posting Date: 11-4-2005
Directed by Jacinto Molina (Paul Naschy)
Featuring Jacinto Molina, Daniela Giordano, Monica Randall

A trio of witch hunters arrive in town to ply their trade. While this is happening, the daughter of the magistrate agrees to sell her soul to the devil for the ability to take vengeance on the man who killed her lover.

The only Paul Naschy film I’ve covered to this point is THE FURY OF THE WOLFMAN, and even giving consideration for its poor dubbing, I was not impressed by either the movie or Naschy’s performance. This marks the first time I’ve seen him playing someone other than El Hombre Lobo, and I have no problem with him in this one. Here he seems to have the real charisma of a horror star, and on a purely physical level (i.e. recognizing the parts of his performance that bypass the poor dubbing), I can sense real emotion and feelings in his character. This is a good thing; I find myself now looking forward to how he handled his other roles.

The movie itself is also fairly effective. It’s in familiar territory involving witch hunters and witches, but I think there’s a little more to this one than CRY OF THE BANSHEE, for example. It has its problems, of course; some of the nudity feels unnecessary and pandering. The torture and violence is unpleasant, and even shocking at times, but at least the movie doesn’t appear to be primarily about sadism. It even manages to make you care about some of the characters, which is quite a trick when you consider how unsympathetic practically all of them are. I mean, is it really possible to choose between an evil that hypocritically believes it is good and one that sincerely believes it is the evil it is?

The Immoral Mr. Teas (1959)

THE IMMORAL MR. TEAS (1959)
Article #1544 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-6-2005
Posting Date: 11-3-2005
Directed by Russ Meyer
Featuring Bill Teas, Ann Peters, Marilyn Wesley

After finding himself tempted by several sexy women during his job, an everyman character begins to fantasize about seeing them naked.

I’m going to reiterate at this point that my criteria for picking these movies is based on their inclusion in books that claim to be covering the genres of Horror, Fantasy and Science Fiction. This movie is listed in John Stanley’s “Creature Features Strike Back”, and the blurb claims the the Mr. Teas of the title takes a drug that allows him to see through clothing. I’m afraid Mr. Stanley and I haven’t seen the same movie. Mr. Teas takes no such drug; he merely fantasizes, and that really isn’t the same thing. Those drawn to the movie under the belief that there’s a fantastic theme here are advised to pass this one by.

Still, I do feel compelled to say that this is the best nudie I’ve seen to date. Granted, I’ve seen very few, and I really have no intention on becoming an expert on them, so take that for what you will. It is also the first Russ Meyer movie I’ve seen, and though this is considered a lesser work of his, I can see his appeal beyond just the ogling factor. The fact of the matter is that there is a wicked sense of humor at play here. He seems to be taking a bit of a satirical jab at those who would watch the movie, but would make some excuses for doing so. While watching three nubile young beauties romping around in the water without a shred of clothing, the narrator talks endlessly about things like the history of bathing, which was considered unhealthy at one point in history. Also consider that many of the times when Mr. Teas fantasizes about seeing women naked, he also fantasizes himself not paying attention to the fact that they’re naked, which is a fairly witty broadside at a certain type of hypocrisy. Let’s face it; there is something to be said for a director that can actually make a nudie interesting.

I Drink Your Blood (1970)

I DRINK YOUR BLOOD (1970)
Article #1543 by Dave Sindelar
Viewing Date: 6-5-2005
Posting Date: 11-2-2005
Directed by David E. Durston
Featuring Bhaskar roy Chowdhury, Jadine Wong, Rhonda Fultz

When a gang of Satanist hippies rapes a girl and force-feeds LSD to an elderly man, a young boy seeks revenge on them by injecting their meat pies with rabies. The hippies go crazy and embark on a killing spree.

“2 Great Blood-Horrors to Rip Out Your Guts!” screamed the adds when the double feature I DRINK YOUR BLOOD / I EAT YOUR SKIN made its way around the drive-in circuit. I’ve already covered the second feature, a lame zombie flick that certainly didn’t threaten your guts in any way. This one comes a lot closer to the type of movie that would be expected by those who were attracted by the promotional phrase. I think the gorehounds would probably be satisfied, though I’m not sure; the DVD claims that this is the uncut director’s version, which had to be cut to receive an ‘R’ rating, so how much of what I saw was actually seen by audiences back then, I don’t know. In it’s present form, it’s a bloody piece of nastiness, somewhat effective, and it hints somewhat at later movies such as LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT and the works of David Cronenberg (particularly RABID). Ultimately, however, it’s a variation on NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD. I’ve also heard it said that the movie might be a comedy, though that’s hard to say; the movie is extremely silly at times and has some laughable dialogue and acting, but I suspect any comedy is unintentional. Animal lovers will surely want to keep away; I suspect some of the scenes involve the real slaughter of animals.